By the Blog Author
It’s getting harder and harder to find fair-minded,
fact-based journalism even in the Anglosphere.
I’d like to share a few useful tricks that I use.
First of all, I don’t assume that one political philosophy
has a monopoly on realism or accurate policy guidance. Therefore I tend to follow both the
center-left news summary of Teagan Goddard’s political wire as well as the
center-right approach of RealClearPolitics.
This is the right path. Both the
left and the right are most trustworthy when they are criticizing themselves.
I have a lot of time on my hands these days, yet I don’t
have any time to waste on modern television “news.” It’s just awful. It’s been going downhill –fast!—ever since
the late John Chancellor was replaced by Connie Chung at NBC many years
ago. The news anchors these days are
closely related, behaviorally and in personal philosophy, to flight attendants
or to game show hosts. They are paid
precisely in accordance with how personable they appear to polled audiences and
focus groups. Therefore those who
survive and thrive are at once vapid yet likeable. Speed reading the headlines on the internet is
a much more productive use of time than vegetating in front of a screen and
being spoon-fed human interest blather of limited value.
A frustrating and worrisome problem that I’m having stems
from the loss of Scientific American as the world standard of good writing
about science. Their modern biases and
painfully trippy attempts to present misinformation as “relevant” have severely
compromised this publication, and there isn’t a good replacement for it. Science journalism can really run away with a
silly fad these days, from “global warming” to the non-existent reappearance of
the ivory-billed woodpecker. What I do
is cherry pick RealClearScience for articles with strong and factual implied
narration and look especially for emerging technologies.
Fortunately, for business and banking issues, there is a
gold standard in worldwide reporting – the Financial Times of London. They were way ahead of everyone else on the
crash of 2008, and they remain the most lucid and useful analysis of financial
matters seven years later.
I am looking for and still have not found alternative media
or blogs that are reliable enough to consistently sample. Some of them are right some of the time, but
this is not an environment where high quality can be found at this date.
Let me close by referring you to an article from Maclean’s
in Canada
that is spot-on as great and trustworthy print journalism. RealClearPolitics is typically at its best
when it references and links to an article from London ,
Ottawa , Toronto , Sydney or Melbourne ,
especially if the article is about geopolitics or America . RCP was my source for the link below. American journalists have lost the ability to
analyze their own territory with unbiased insight and trustworthy internal
narration. The best of our Canadian
neighbors still know how to spot and important political story and cover the facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment