8 RINO Rules
By the Conservative Review staffFebruary 24, 2015
It becomes clearer every day that there are not only two
parties in Washington , D.C. , but there are also two wings of the
Republican Party. Conservatives who fight for limited government, fewer taxes,
less regulation, more freedom, devolving federal power to the states, prudent
immigration, and constitutional principles
The other wing?
Whether you call them RINOs (Republican
In Name Only), liberal
Republicans or the Establishment, for them, it’s all about retaining the power
that comes from working their well-established connections around “town.”
Some have raised the question, ‘You don’t really
think that these members want to help/support/defend Obama’s agenda and
policies – do you?’
Hopefully not, but their actions seem to align a
lot closer with liberals than conservatives on many issues, so it’s hard to
say.
So what guides these powerful liberal
Republicans?
Here are the 8 RINO rules:
1. Bait and Switch
This can also be referred to as “politics over
principle” or “don’t fight now, fight later”. Members that have roamed the
halls of Congress for multiple years have made a lot of campaign promises along
the way, and they have undoubtedly broken a few of them. Some even admit a
broken promise. Just look at Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) admitting he lied when
asked whether he would honor his term limits commitment. When it comes to the
big promises, you’d think politicians would stick to them.
This is where bait-and-switch comes into play:
find a reason and tell the press in spin-o-riffic fashion why a vote for or
against that promise would ultimately be a wasted vote. To them, party comes
first, the next election, or the next fight. This is the main reason that the
proverbial can continually gets kicked down the road. That really core thing,
like not raising taxes – that will be fought for next time.
Right now is about keeping power, gaining goodwill for
self-advancement, or supposedly gaining leverage, ironically the leverage
doesn’t actually get used.
2. Show Me the Money
Votes win elections and money is used to get
votes, therefore simple calculus tells a RINO that money is the most important
thing ever. It just so happens that special interest has lots
of money. So what if this vote will raise taxes? Don’t worry, the Establishment
needs this vote to remain in power and appease the special
interest. This rule usually coincides with adherence to #1 where special
interest greases the skids for the passage of a 1000-page bill as long as there
is something that tips the scales in their favor. Unfortunately, it is easier
to lobby Congress for a handout than it is for special interests to innovate.
3. Fear
This one is simple – they instill fear in you the
voter. You don’t want a Democrat in office – do you? Of course you
don’t, so you must vote for the RINO. But don’t worry, all those things they do
that seem morally repugnant, they are just pragmatic actions to remain in
power. Again, you don’t want a Democrat in office – do you?
4. Governing
This word is politician-speak for capitulation.
If they ever use this word, they are probably a RINO, because it means they are
more concerned with keeping power, making friends, or raising money. So again,
governing involves politics over principle, money, and then of course, fear.
5. Double Standards
RINOs love double standards. They moan and complain about
conservative primary challenges, but two years away from their next election,
they will spend millions bashing and hammering conservatives back home in an
effort to soften the ground for their next race. They will taint every
conservative candidate as an unwashed, unelectable, extremist wacko, but the
minute their people are caught with baggage (Steve Scalise (R-LA) with David
Duke and Thad Cochran (R-MS) with neo-confederate organizations) they circle
the wagons. As long as you support amnesty and are a member of the governing
elite in good standing you can do no wrong. Again, politics, money, and fear
are major cornerstones of these members, and they work well when it comes to
double standards. Plus, double standards help them explain away their sellout
votes with ease.
6. Me Too
Originating in the 1930's, a term that tells
the listener the RINO in question agrees with Democrats on issues with
only moderating differences. As in when a Democrat says, "I believe
in federal funding and involvement in education" the RINO responds,
"Me too. But there is another way to manage this better." The
political intent is to show that the RINO is socially acceptable and not an extremist,
in other words, not a conservative. Their argument is that they are better
managers of government than liberals, but ultimately both end up at the same
place. The “me too” RINO just takes longer to arrive at the liberal destination
and doesn’t stop the damage to our economy, society, or nation from a bloated
all-powerful central government.
7. Pragmatic
Pragmatic in the world of both RINO's and
leftists is a buzz word meaning “not conservative." The implication,
sometimes stated outright, is that conservatism is “ideological” while
“liberalism” is just plain reality. And therefore to deal with reality – to
"get things done" – a RINO advocates being “pragmatic”. Which, in
practice, means accepting the liberal world view on an issue. For example, we
must have highways and bridges; therefore, the “pragmatic” thing to do is
raise the gas tax. Thus, the “pragmatic” question is about “how much the
federal gas tax should be raised – by five cents or ten cents?” The question
can never be "should we place the states in charge of funding their own
highways and abolish the federal gas tax?” thereby ending the federal
addiction to this money pit for mass transit and payoffs to Big Labor.
8. Preemptive Surrender
RINOs love to announce their plans to surrender in advance. For example, after the 2014 midterms, liberal Republican Leadership in both the House and the Senate announced that no matter what Obama did or would do to bypass Congress, they wouldn’t use any must pass bill as a leverage point. For all practical purposes the Establishment surrendered before they even took the field. This was all part of “governing” and used the tried and true “bait and switch” to promise to fight later. And every time that the Establishment announces surrender and kicks the can down the road it only emboldens Obama and Democrats to hold firm and not negotiate.
No comments:
Post a Comment