Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and
the Rise of the Anti-Scientific Left by Alex Berezow and Hank Campbell -- book reviews on Amazon.com:
To listen to most pundits and political writers, evolution,
stem cells, and climate change are the only scientific issues worth
mentioning—and the only people who are anti-science are conservatives. Yet
those on the left have numerous fallacies of their own. Aversion to clean
energy programs, basic biological research, and even life-saving vaccines come
naturally to many progressives. These are positions supported by little more
than junk-science and paranoid thinking.
Now for the first time, science writers Dr. Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell have drawn open the curtain on the left’s fear of science. As Science Left Behind reveals, vague inclinations about the wholesomeness of all things natural, the unhealthiness of the unnatural, and many other seductive fallacies have led to an epidemic of misinformation. The results: public health crises, damaging and misguided policies, and worst of all, a new culture war over basic scientific facts—in which the left is just as culpable as the right.
Now for the first time, science writers Dr. Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell have drawn open the curtain on the left’s fear of science. As Science Left Behind reveals, vague inclinations about the wholesomeness of all things natural, the unhealthiness of the unnatural, and many other seductive fallacies have led to an epidemic of misinformation. The results: public health crises, damaging and misguided policies, and worst of all, a new culture war over basic scientific facts—in which the left is just as culpable as the right.
Editorial Reviews
Booklist
The authors spend a fair amount of time at the
outset of this unsettling book explaining that they don’t have a political
agenda, but the book’s subtitle, combined with its stated purpose—“to inform
you about a disturbing trend among highly influential progressive activists who
misinterpret, misrepresent, and abuse science to advance
their ideological and political agendas”—might lead some readers to conclude
otherwise. Leaving politics aside, though, there is much here to recommend. The
science is clearly explained, and the issues surrounding the science laid out
with clarity. There are a lot of hot-button topics here: environmentalism, genetically
modified organisms, organic food, product testing on animals, solar power,
clean energy, and more. The authors explore the issues in detail, working very
hard to give the appearance of political neutrality, and the book does an
excellent job of opening readers’ minds to the possibility that these issues
aren’t as cut-and-dried as they might have been led to believe by politicians
and the media. Open-minded readers, those who don’t mind being asked to
reassess their long-held beliefs, should find much here to think about and
debate. --David Pitt
Kirkus
“A sophisticatedly vitriolic, somewhat tongue-in-cheek addition to the current election debate.”
Publishers Weekly
“Their nonpartisan message is clear: Washington as a whole is woefully uninformed when it comes to the scientific underpinnings of pertinent topics like stem cell research, green energy, organic food, vaccines, and gender issues."
Huntington News
“Groundbreaking…If I were teaching journalism, this is a book that I would require my students to read and absorb -- and keep for reference.”
“A sophisticatedly vitriolic, somewhat tongue-in-cheek addition to the current election debate.”
Publishers Weekly
“Their nonpartisan message is clear: Washington as a whole is woefully uninformed when it comes to the scientific underpinnings of pertinent topics like stem cell research, green energy, organic food, vaccines, and gender issues."
“Groundbreaking…If I were teaching journalism, this is a book that I would require my students to read and absorb -- and keep for reference.”
The Progressive Contrarian
“A no-nonsense, sometimes brutal and sometimes
funny book that progressives should read.”Red, Green, and Blue.org
PolicyMic
Wall Street Journal
“In Science Left Behind, journalists
Alex B. Berezow and Hank Campbell show that conservatives hardly have a
monopoly on motivated reasoning, usefully revealing how pervasive scientific
misinformation is in progressive arguments on organic and genetically modified
foods, clean energy, nuclear waste and other matters.”
Forbes
“Alex Berezow and Hank Campbell, co-authors of
Science Left Behind: Feel-Good Fallacies and the Rise of the Anti-Scientific
Left, make a nuanced and convincing counter argument: Ludditism is not a
partisan issue. In fact, on many of the most critical issues of our time, the
“progressive” perspective is often rooted in out-dated, anti-empirical, junk
science paradigms that threaten innovation—and are beginning to unnerve the
most scientifically minded thinkers on the left….This soft conspiracy, promoted
by mainstream Democrats, infects a broad array of science issues and highlights
the religious-like iconic beliefs of the left (as Kloor has noted): Nature is
sacred, big business is dangerous and corrupt, technology can cause more
problems than it helps solve, the world is on the verge of an eco-apocalypse,
and we need more precaution, regulation and legislation. I call it
enviro-romanticism, a criticism documented in distressing detail in Science
Left Behind…Read Science Left Behind. It’s a clarion call for the
empirically minded amongst us regardless of your ideological persuasion.”Booklist
Commentary Magazine
San Francisco Book Review
“Science Left Behind challenges
the notion that poorly informed anti-science rhetoric is solely the province of
the right wing…Berezow and
No comments:
Post a Comment