Positive Quiddity: Brilliant Military Intelligence

I want to share something with you.  It's called "excellent intelligence."  This is the quality that wins wars and keeps us out of unnecessary wars.  Please take a long, careful look at these two maps -- the present middle east and a stable middle east.  Either we are moving toward the second map, or we are wasting time and lives accomplishing, at best, nothing.

These maps were included in a June, 2006 article in Armed Forces Journal by Ralph Peters.  The maps are still good -- they should be studied when examing modern Iraq, the "Arab Spring" and the current conflict over Iranian nuclear research.

Below is a Wikipedia entry on Peters.

Ralph Peters

Ralph Peters (b. 1952) is a retired United States Army Lieutenant Colonel, novelist and essayist. He has sometimes written under the nom-de-plume Owen Parry.

Early Life and Military Career 

Peters was born in Pottsville, Pennsylvania, but grew up in Schuylkill Haven. His father was a coal miner and unsuccessful businessman. Peters has written "I am a miner's son, and my father was a self-made man who unmade himself in my youth."

Peters enlisted in the Army as a private, and spent ten years in Germany working in military intelligence. Years later, during the 2004 Killian documents controversy, Peters pointed out that in his front-line division in 1977, five years after the memos in question were allegedly written, only the general's secretary had an electric typewriter. It was, he says, too primitive to produce the documents in question, and moreover, National Guard units "…got the junk we didn't want."

After returning from Germany, Peters attended Officer Candidate School and received his commission, eventually attending the Command and General Staff College. His last assignment was to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence. He retired in 1998 with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel.

Peters has appeared on PBS, FOX News, CNN and other networks with commentary on military issues and current affairs.


Peters's first novel was Bravo Romeo, a spy thriller set in former West Germany. His novels progressed from futuristic scenarios involving the Red Army to contemporary terrorism and failed state issues. His characters are often presented as military mavericks who have the clairvoyance and courage to tackle problems others can't or won't.

His latest book is titled Never Quit the Fight, and was released on July 10, 2006.

Opinion on the Iraq war

Peters was a strong supporter of the 2003 invasion and ongoing war in Iraq. Defending the war from critics who claimed that Iraq was descending into civil war, he authored a March 5, 2006 piece in the New York Post entitled Dude, Where's My Civil War?, in which he wrote:

I'm looking for the civil war that The New York Times declared. And I just can't find it...The Iraqi Army has confounded its Western critics, performing extremely well last week. And the people trust their new army to an encouraging degree. Claims that Iraq was descending into civil war, he wrote, were the politically motivated claims of "irresponsible journalists" who have "staked their reputations on Iraq's failure."
However, six months later, in an interview with FrontPageMag.com magazine, the triumphalism that had informed his writing on Iraq for years was gone. He said:




civil war is closer than it was...The leaders squabble, the death squads rule the neighborhoods. [1] While it would be "too early to walk away from Iraq", the fate of the country was threatened by the US's failure after the invasion to provide adequate troop levels to maintain order, as well as "the Arab genius for screwing things up." On November 2, 2006, he wrote in USA Today:




Iraq is failing. No honest observer can conclude otherwise. Even six months ago, there was hope. Now the chances for a democratic, unified Iraq are dwindling fast ... Iraq could have turned out differently. It didn't. And we must be honest about it. We owe that much to our troops. They don't face the mere forfeiture of a few congressional seats but the loss of their lives. Our military is now being employed for political purposes. It's unworthy of our nation.[2] In this piece he also speculates that "only a military coup — which might come in the next few years — could hold the artificial country together" and that [i]t appears that the cynics were right: Arab societies can't support democracy as we know it. Following the 2006 US Congressional election, Peters wrote:





It's going to be hard. The political aim of the Democrats will be to continue talking a good game while avoiding responsibility through '08. They'll send up bills they know Bush will veto. And they'll struggle to hide the infighting in their own ranks - Dem unity on this war is about as solid as the unity of Iraq. Now that they've won on the issue, the Dems would like Iraq to just go away. But it won't. And they've got to avoid looking weak on defense, so the military will get more money for personnel, at least. But we won't get a comprehensive plan to deal with Iraq or, for that matter, our global struggle with Islamist terrorists. No matter how many troops we send, we're bound to fail if the troops aren't allowed to fight - under the leadership of combat commanders, not politically attuned bureaucrats in uniform. At present, neither party's leaders want to face the truth about warfare - that it can't be done on the cheap and that war can't be waged without shedding blood. [3] He recently suggested that the borders in the middle east must be redrawn as he suggests in the above map.

References

1. Never Quit the Fight. Frontpage (August 2, 2006).
2. Last Gasps in Iraq. USA Today (November 2, 2006).
3. New Iraq Risks: What the Election Means (November 9[2006]).