Science Denial Not Limited to
Political Right
University
of Illinois at Chicago , September 19, 2017 -- In the wake of Hurricanes
Harvey and Irma, many claims have been made that science denial, particularly
as it relates to climate change, is primarily a problem of the political right.
But what happens when scientific
conclusions challenge liberals’ attitudes on public policy issues, such as gun
control, nuclear power or immigration?
A new study from social
psychologists at the University
of Illinois at Chicago
and published online
in Social Psychological and Personality Science suggests people of all
political backgrounds can be motivated to participate in science denial.
UIC researchers Anthony
Washburn, a graduate student in psychology, and Linda Skitka, professor of
psychology, had participants indicate their political orientation, evaluate
fabricated scientific results, and, based on the data, decide what the studies
concluded.
Once they were informed of the
correct interpretations of the data, participants were then asked to rate how
much they agreed with, found knowledgeable, and trusted the researchers’
correct interpretation.
“Not only were both sides
equally likely to seek out attitude confirming scientific conclusions, both
were also willing to work harder and longer when doing so got them to a
conclusion that fit with their existing attitudes,” says Washburn, the lead author
of the study. “And when the correct interpretation of the results did not
confirm participants’ attitudes, they were more likely to view the researchers
involved with the study as less trustworthy, less knowledgeable, and disagreed
with their conclusions more.”
These effects were constant no
matter what issue was under consideration, which included six social issues —
immigration, gun control, climate change, health care reform, nuclear power and
same sex marriage — and one control issue — skin rash treatment.
Rather than strictly a
conservative phenomenon, science denial may be a result of a more basic desire
of people wanting to see the world in ways that fit with their personal
preferences, political or otherwise, according to the researchers.
The results also shed light on
science denial in public discourse, Skitka added.
“Before assuming that one group
of people or another are anti-science because they disagree with one scientific
conclusion, we should make an effort to consider different motivations that are
likely at play, which might have nothing to do with science per se,” she said.
No comments:
Post a Comment