Pollster
Who Got It Right in 2016 Does It Again
By Tom Bevan -- RCP Staff
Cahaly managed to pick up support for Trump that all other pollsters missed by employing a unique method that sought to measure support from voters who'd been “inactive” in recent election cycles, as well as adding a question to his surveys designed to isolate the effect of social desirability bias among Trump voters – the concept that people won’t tell pollsters their true intentions for fear of being stigmatized or being politically incorrect.
After asking voters who they were supporting in 2016, the pollster followed up by asking them who they thought their neighbors were supporting, Trump orClinton .
Cahaly consistently found a high degree of variance between who respondents
said they were voting for and who they thought their neighbors were voting for,
suggesting there was in fact a “shy Trump effect” at play.
Two years later, Cahaly’s method once again proved solid. In one of the most polled races of the cycle, Trafalgar stood alone as the only polling firm to correctly show a Ron DeSantis gubernatorial victory inFlorida
– as well as Rick Scott winning the Senate race there. (Both narrow outcomes
will likely result in recounts.)
Trafalgar also correctly predicted Senate outcomes in Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Texas and West Virginia (as of this writing Arizona remains undecided), making it the most accurate pollster of the cycle among those firms that polled multiple Senate and governor races.
Even with Trump not technically on the ballot, Cahaly found social desirability bias playing a role. In theFlorida and Georgia governor contests, some of
that was attributable to race – often referred to as “the Bradley effect” – but
Cahaly also found a “shy Trump” effect playing a role in places like the
Arizona Senate race.
In theGeorgia governor race, Cahaly’s
results showed a big win for Republican Brian Kemp over Democrat Stacey Abrams.
The final result, however, was a much closer Kemp victory. Cahaly gave credit
to the Abrams campaign.
“They did a great job of registering voters late and bringing lots of new people into the process,” he told RealClearPolitics by phone on Thursday.
The same was true inTexas , Cahaly said, where Beto O’Rourke
finished just 2.6 percentage points behind Ted Cruz.
Still, the pollster believes his method and methodology will be more valuable than ever as low voter response rates and social desirability bias continue to present challenges to all pollsters in the future.
“What few mistakes we made this time, we won’t make again,” he said.
Based on its record in 2016 and this year, Trafalgar is a polling firm to watch as Trump’s 2020 re-election bid heats up -- and an expected large field of Democrats jockey for the right to oppose him.
Tom Bevan is the co-founder and publisher of RealClearPolitics and the co-author of "Election 2012: A Time for Choosing." Email: tom@realclearpolitics.com, Twitter: @TomBevanRCP
By Tom Bevan -- RCP Staff
November 10, 2018 -- Robert
Cahaly, senior strategist for the Trafalgar Group, made a name for himself in
2016 by being the only pollster to correctly show Donald Trump with a lead in Michigan and Pennsylvania
-- two key states he carried -- heading into Election Day. (He did not poll Wisconsin , another
surprising win for Trump.) Cahaly also showed Trump ahead in North
Carolina and Florida ,
both of which he won, securing his improbable 304-227 Electoral College victory
over Hillary Clinton.
Cahaly managed to pick up support for Trump that all other pollsters missed by employing a unique method that sought to measure support from voters who'd been “inactive” in recent election cycles, as well as adding a question to his surveys designed to isolate the effect of social desirability bias among Trump voters – the concept that people won’t tell pollsters their true intentions for fear of being stigmatized or being politically incorrect.
After asking voters who they were supporting in 2016, the pollster followed up by asking them who they thought their neighbors were supporting, Trump or
Two years later, Cahaly’s method once again proved solid. In one of the most polled races of the cycle, Trafalgar stood alone as the only polling firm to correctly show a Ron DeSantis gubernatorial victory in
Trafalgar also correctly predicted Senate outcomes in Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Texas and West Virginia (as of this writing Arizona remains undecided), making it the most accurate pollster of the cycle among those firms that polled multiple Senate and governor races.
Even with Trump not technically on the ballot, Cahaly found social desirability bias playing a role. In the
In the
“They did a great job of registering voters late and bringing lots of new people into the process,” he told RealClearPolitics by phone on Thursday.
The same was true in
Still, the pollster believes his method and methodology will be more valuable than ever as low voter response rates and social desirability bias continue to present challenges to all pollsters in the future.
“What few mistakes we made this time, we won’t make again,” he said.
Based on its record in 2016 and this year, Trafalgar is a polling firm to watch as Trump’s 2020 re-election bid heats up -- and an expected large field of Democrats jockey for the right to oppose him.
Tom Bevan is the co-founder and publisher of RealClearPolitics and the co-author of "Election 2012: A Time for Choosing." Email: tom@realclearpolitics.com, Twitter: @TomBevanRCP
No comments:
Post a Comment