Mission would be viable if it doesn’t exceed four years, international research team concludes
From: University of California Los
Angeles
August 26, 2021 -- Sending human
travelers to Mars would require scientists and engineers to overcome a range of
technological and safety obstacles. One of them is the grave risk posed by
particle radiation from the sun, distant stars and galaxies.
Answering two key questions would go a
long way toward overcoming that hurdle: Would particle radiation pose too grave
a threat to human life throughout a round trip to the red planet? And, could
the very timing of a mission to Mars help shield astronauts and the spacecraft
from the radiation?
In a new article published in the
peer-reviewed journal Space Weather, an international team of space
scientists, including researchers from UCLA, answers those two questions with a
"no" and a "yes."
That is, humans should be able to safely
travel to and from Mars, provided that the spacecraft has sufficient shielding
and the round trip is shorter than approximately four years. And the timing of
a human mission to Mars would indeed make a difference: The scientists
determined that the best time for a flight to leave Earth would be when solar
activity is at its peak, known as the solar maximum.
The scientists' calculations demonstrate
that it would be possible to shield a Mars-bound spacecraft from energetic
particles from the sun because, during solar maximum, the most dangerous and
energetic particles from distant galaxies are deflected by the enhanced solar
activity.
A trip of that length would be
conceivable. The average flight to Mars takes about nine months, so depending
on the timing of launch and available fuel, it is plausible that a human
mission could reach the planet and return to Earth in less than two years,
according to Yuri Shprits, a UCLA research geophysicist and co-author of the
paper.
"This study shows that while space
radiation imposes strict limitations on how heavy the spacecraft can be and the
time of launch, and it presents technological difficulties for human missions
to Mars, such a mission is viable," said Shprits, who also is head of
space physics and space weather at GFZ Research Centre for Geosciences in
Potsdam, Germany.
The researchers recommend a mission not
longer than four years because a longer journey would expose astronauts to a
dangerously high amount of radiation during the round trip -- even assuming
they went when it was relatively safer than at other times. They also report
that the main danger to such a flight would be particles from outside of our
solar system.
Shprits and colleagues from UCLA, MIT,
Moscow's Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology and GFZ Potsdam combined
geophysical models of particle radiation for a solar cycle with models for how
radiation would affect both human passengers -- including its varying effects
on different bodily organs -- and a spacecraft. The modeling determined that
having a spacecraft's shell built out of a relatively thick material could help
protect astronauts from radiation, but that if the shielding is too thick, it
could actually increase the amount of secondary radiation to which they are
exposed.
The two main types of hazardous
radiation in space are solar energetic particles and galactic cosmic rays; the
intensity of each depends on solar activity. Galactic cosmic ray activity is
lowest within the six to 12 months after the peak of solar activity, while
solar energetic particles' intensity is greatest during solar maximum, Shprits
said.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/08/210826111716.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment