The Nerva–Antonine dynasty
was a dynasty of seven Roman Emperors who ruled over the Roman
Empire from 96 AD to 192 AD. These Emperors are Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian,
Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Lucius Verus, and Commodus.
The first five of the six successions within this dynasty were notable in that the reigning Emperor adopted the candidate of his choice to be his successor. Under Roman law, an adoption established a bond legally as strong as that of kinship. Because of this, all but the first and last of the Nerva-Antonine emperors are called Adoptive Emperors.
The importance of official adoption in Roman society has often been considered as a conscious repudiation of the principle of dynastic inheritance and has been deemed as one of the factors of the period's prosperity. However, this was not a new practice. It was common for patrician families to adopt, and Roman emperors had adopted heirs in the past: The Emperor Augustus had adopted Tiberius and the Emperor Claudius had adopted Nero. Julius Caesar, dictator perpetuo and considered to be instrumental in the transition from Republic to Empire, adopted Gaius Octavius, who would become Augustus,Rome 's
first emperor. Moreover, there was a family connection as Trajan adopted his
first cousin once removed and great-nephew by marriage Hadrian and Hadrian made
his half-nephew by marriage and heir Antoninus Pius adopt both Hadrian's second
cousin three times removed and half-great-nephew by marriage Marcus Aurelius,
also Antoninus' nephew by marriage, and the son of his original planned
successor, Lucius Verus. The naming by Marcus Aurelius of his son Commodus was
considered to be an unfortunate choice and the beginning of the Empire's
decline.
With Commodus' murder in 192, the Nerva-Antonine dynasty came to an end; it was followed by a period of turbulence known as the Year of the Five Emperors.
The rulers commonly known as the "Five Good Emperors" were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius. The term was coined by the political philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli in 1503:
Machiavelli argued that these adopted emperors, through good rule, earned the respect of those around them:
The 18th-century historian Edward Gibbon, in his work The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, opined that their rule was a time when "theRoman
Empire was governed by absolute power, under the guidance of
wisdom and virtue". Gibbon believed these benevolent dictators and their
moderate policies were unusual and contrasted with their more tyrannical and
oppressive successors.
Gibbon went so far as to state:
The first five of the six successions within this dynasty were notable in that the reigning Emperor adopted the candidate of his choice to be his successor. Under Roman law, an adoption established a bond legally as strong as that of kinship. Because of this, all but the first and last of the Nerva-Antonine emperors are called Adoptive Emperors.
The importance of official adoption in Roman society has often been considered as a conscious repudiation of the principle of dynastic inheritance and has been deemed as one of the factors of the period's prosperity. However, this was not a new practice. It was common for patrician families to adopt, and Roman emperors had adopted heirs in the past: The Emperor Augustus had adopted Tiberius and the Emperor Claudius had adopted Nero. Julius Caesar, dictator perpetuo and considered to be instrumental in the transition from Republic to Empire, adopted Gaius Octavius, who would become Augustus,
With Commodus' murder in 192, the Nerva-Antonine dynasty came to an end; it was followed by a period of turbulence known as the Year of the Five Emperors.
The Five Good Emporers
The rulers commonly known as the "Five Good Emperors" were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius. The term was coined by the political philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli in 1503:
From the study of this history
we may also learn how a good government is to be established; for while all the
emperors who succeeded to the throne by birth, except Titus, were bad, all were
good who succeeded by adoption, as in the case of the five from Nerva to
Marcus. But as soon as the empire fell once more to the heirs by birth, its
ruin recommenced.
Machiavelli argued that these adopted emperors, through good rule, earned the respect of those around them:
Titus, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian,
Antoninus, and Marcus had no need of praetorian cohorts, or of countless
legions to guard them, but were defended by their own good lives, the good-will
of their subjects, and the attachment of the senate.
The 18th-century historian Edward Gibbon, in his work The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, opined that their rule was a time when "the
Gibbon went so far as to state:
If a man were called to fix
the period in the history of the world during which the condition of the human
race was most happy and prosperous, he would, without hesitation, name that
which elapsed from the death of Domitian to the accession of Commodus. The vast
extent of the Roman Empire was governed by
absolute power, under the guidance of virtue and wisdom. The armies were
restrained by the firm but gentle hand of four successive emperors, whose
characters and authority commanded respect. The forms of the civil
administration were carefully preserved by Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian and the
Antonines, who delighted in the image of liberty, and were pleased with
considering themselves as the accountable ministers of the laws. Such princes
deserved the honour of restoring the republic, had the Romans of their days
been capable of enjoying a rational freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment