Study disentangles two ways of thinking about self-control to examine role willpower plays in restraint
From: Rutgers University
August 10, 2022 -- In
Greek mythology, the story of Odysseus and the Sirens illustrates a
paradigmatic example of self-control. When
the hero of Homer's epic prepared to travel past the Sirens, mythical creatures
who lure sailors with their enchanted singing, Odysseus instructs his crew to
plug their ears with wax and tie him to the ship's mast. That way, Odysseus can
listen to the Sirens as he sails by, and the crew can keep
their wits. No matter
how much he begs to be released, no one will hear his pleas.
Was Odysseus exercising
willpower with his plan, or was he merely removing his ability to cave to
temptation?
Jordan Bridges, a
doctoral student in the Rutgers Department of Philosophy, has coauthored a
paper in the journal Cognition explaining why this distinction
matters for the study of self-control, and what it might tell us about how mere
mortals view the power of willpower.
Researchers have long
wondered what tools people successfully use to resist temptations -- like
eating another bag of potato chips or checking Facebook one more time before
bed. And while no one really knows why some of us have more self-control than
others, psychologists and behavioral economists know a lot about the methods
people use to resist temptation.
Bridges said one method
is called diachronic regulation, which involves selecting and modifying one's
situation and cultivating habits over time to avoid temptation -- essentially
removing willpower from the equation. A second approach, synchronic regulation,
relies on deliberate, effortful willpower in the moment to resist temptation.
Psychologists and
economists have increasingly argued that because willpower is difficult to
exercise, diachronic regulation is more effective than synchronic regulation.
This conclusion is based in part on the failure of willpower-driven campaigns
(such as Nancy Reagan's "Just Say No" campaign, which had no
measurable effects on youth tobacco, alcohol or drug use).
But Bridges and her
colleagues hypothesized that such assessments of synchronic regulation rested
on a faulty interpretation of the data, that supposed examples of effective
purely diachronic strategies involved the use of willpower to implement, and
that the popular, or "folk," view of willpower is just as important.
"We theorized that
it takes willpower to implement temptation-avoidance strategies," said
Bridges.
Using a multifactorial
research design, the researchers sought to decontaminate cases of self-control
to test how people viewed synchronic and diachronic regulation as separate
entities. Participants in four experiments were asked to read a short story
about a character named Mo -- in which he uses different self-control tactics
to refrain from drinking coffee, eating junk food, using social media and
socializing - and then rate his level of self-control.
What they found was
that when synchronic and diachronic forms of regulation were pulled apart,
participants thought only willpower counted as self-control; pure diachronic
strategies did not. And in mixed cases involving both forms of regulation, when
participants rated the cases as involving the exercise of self-control, they
did so only because they involved synchronic
regulation, not the more behavioral framework of temptation avoidance.
Bridges said these findings
are important for the study of self-control, and for how psychologists,
philosophers, economists and clinical practitioners discuss these concepts.
"Scientific
discussion, and science communication, can often involve debates over terms
that don't track how we ordinarily use them," said Bridges. "If we
care about successfully communicating scientific results, we need to speak in
terms that people understand."
She added: "People
often infer that it's the diachronic strategy doing the self-control work, when
really, moments of synchronic regulation are being amplified with diachronic
strategy. Understanding the role of willpower in self-control has implications
for the way we talk about helping people break habits."
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/08/220810134127.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment