Some organisms thrive in oxygen-less environment
From: MIT Research
December 25, 2000 -- In
May, a study was published in journal Nature Astronomy, conducted
by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Dr Sara
Seager and other researchers, showing single-celled organisms
like Escherichia coli (E. coli) and yeast can
thrive in both 100% hydrogen gas and helium atmospheres. Wikinews discussed
the findings with Dr Seager to know more about her research.
Life has not been
observed in any habitat other than Earth, which has an oxygen-rich
environment. While Earth's atmosphere is dominated by nitrogen gas,
oxygen is essential for advanced living organisms. Some species of
microorganisms do not require oxygen for metabolism, called anærobic
organisms, such as methanogens which rely on carbon-dioxide while
releasing methane.
Researchers used Escherichia
coli strain K-12 and Saccharomyces cerevisiæ strain
S288C for this experiment. The two microorganisms were kept in four different
environments: one being 100% air, and the other three being anærobic
environments: 100% H2, 100% He, and 80%-20% N2-CO2.
The environments were kept in at 28° Celsius. The researchers made sure the
anaerobic experiment environments were anoxic, and had installed oxygen sensors
to report fluctuation in the oxygen level. They monitored growth of E.
coli using optical density measurement, and they used a hæmocytometer for
yeast.
The study reported the
organisms were reproducing normally in both 100% H2 and 100% He
environment. However, the sigmoid-shaped growth curve was not on par with
100% air. E. coli and yeast switch from ærobic respiration,
which uses oxygen, to anærobic respiration and fermentation. Both processes are
less efficient and do not produce as much energy as ærobic respiration.
E. coli in an 80%-20% N2-CO2 environment
had slower growth rate as CO2 dissolves and makes the liquid
medium acidic. Such reduction in growth rate was not observed for yeast
cultures, which can thrive in acidic environments. However, yeast's growth rate
in 100% air was far greater than in the other three media. The likely reason
for this significant difference was lack of oxygen for non-respiratory
purposes, the research reported. Oxygen is essential for synthesis of
biochemicals such as heme and sterols, which are important for yeast. In
atmospheres lacking oxygen to produce these chemicals, yeast fungi have stunted
growth rate.
With this discovery, Dr
Seager said scientists can now observe even more planets to study for habitable
life.
"There's a
diversity of habitable worlds out there, and we have confirmed that Earth-based
life can survive in hydrogen-rich atmospheres. We should definitely add those
kinds of planets to the menu of options when thinking of life on other worlds,
and actually trying to find it", Professor Seager said.
A rocky planet with
expanded hydrogen-rich atmosphere should be easy to detect using the emerging
technologies. Hydrogen and helium gas have very low density. Dr Seager said,
"It's kind of hard to get your head around, but that light gas just makes
the atmosphere more expansive [...] And for telescopes, the bigger the
atmosphere is compared to the backdrop of a planet's star, the easier it is to
detect."
The research paper
noted rocky planets which have radius below 1.7 times Earth's radius (Earth's
radius is roughly 6360 km) can support a hydrogen-rich atmosphere, if
water were to react with Iron.
The research paper
reported E. coli releases a number of gases when it lives in
hydrogen-based atmosphere including ammonia, methanethiol, dimethylsulfide, carbonyl
sulfide, carbonyl disulfide and nitrous oxide. These gases can
serve as biosignature gases which can help astronomers detect and
study potential life on exoplanets.
Confirming life can
thrive in atmospheres that do not have oxygen, Seager said "Astronomers
should keep an open mind as to which planets are worth searching for
life".
With NASA's James
Webb Telescope scheduled to be deployed next year, the paper suggests
researchers could observe smaller exoplanets that orbit small red-dwarf stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment