Canadian Teenager Finds Lost
Mayan
City Using a Celestrial Theory
[blog] Posted on May 15, 2016 by Joseph P. Farrell
City Using a Celestrial Theory
[blog] Posted on May 15, 2016 by Joseph P. Farrell
15 year old Canadian teenager William Gadoury has been
instrumental and responsible for the discovery of a new and previously lost
Mayan city in Meso-America, in this article that was seen and shared by so many
regular readers here that I cannot possibly mention them all:
Teen's Stellar Theory Leads to Lost Mayan City
This short story can be cited almost in its entirety:
(Newser) – William Gadoury has spent a fifth of his
life researching the ancient Maya, and the 15-year-old's effort has just paid
off in a big way—with the apparent discovery of a lost city. "I did not
understand why the Maya built their cities away from rivers, on marginal lands
and in the mountains," the Quebec
teen tells the Journal of Montreal. He did, however, know that the Mayans
worshiped the stars, so William began comparing constellations to a land map
and was "surprised and excited" to find that 117 Mayan cities were
mapped out according to the stars, reports Yucatan Living. No one else had ever
discovered such a correlation, according to Yucatan Expat Life. Then William
noticed that only two Mayan cities lined up to a constellation of three stars,
which he believed meant a lost city was hiding in the southern Yucatan Peninsula
near Belize .
William informed the Canadian Space Agency, which provided
satellite images of the area taken after a forest fire in 2005. They revealed
the presence of a 282-foot-tall pyramid, plus 30 other structures. These can
"hardly be attributed to natural phenomena," says Dr. Armand LaRocque,
an expert in remote sensing at the University
of New Brunswick . Based
on the images, the city is believed to be one of the five largest in Mayan
civilization. William has named it K'àak' Chi' or "Fire Mouth," but
hasn't actually seen the site. (Emphasis added)
What I find incredibly interesting here is the scientific
manner in which Mr. Gadoury proceeded: (1) he knew of the Mayan fascination
with the stars (2) correlated stellar positions with the locations of known
Mayan cities (3) noticed alignments of some of those cities with certain stars
and constellations (4) noticed there was no known city where there should have
been, and (5) predicted there should be a city there, and asked the Canadian
Space Agency to look, and, voila. To my knowledge, this is one of the first
such uses of the theory of celestial alignments to find a major city, though
the theory of celestial alignments has been around for quite some time in the
alternative community.
In other words, Mr. Gadoury gets not only the honor and
distinction of provisionally naming the city which he predicted and discovered,
but he has confirmed a wider theory about ancient cultures and celestial
alignments, a theory championed by various alternative researchers, from Thomas
Brophy's, Robert Bauval's, Graham Hancock's and other investigators of ancient
Egypt, to those who've been invastigating Martian ruins, Moon ruins, and other
terrestrial megaplithic sites, including Sir Normal Lockyear and other
investigators.
What Mr. Gadoury has done is to provide yet another
confirmation that celestial archeo-astronomy and astro-archeology is not a
fringe theory of the alternative research community.
It's very real, and in Mr. Gadoury's case,capable of making
predictions, and telling us "look here."
So where's the high octane speculation here?
I suggest that it is this: it is only a matter of time until
this technique is applied to ancient texts. This is not to say it has not
already been done; it has. But I suspect that there is much more lurking in
them, and in known archeological sites, that we've only begun to explore. Not
the least of these questions is why were the ancients so fascinated, and so
determined, to build their sites and temples and cities incorporating such
alignments? Of course, academic will answer with the usual
"religious" motivations and "arguments from
superstitution." But I suspect the reasons are much, much deeper than
that, and perhaps very scientifically sophisticated.
No comments:
Post a Comment