Trump and Obstruction Evidence

President Donald Trump is furious with retired judge (and Fox News legal analyst) Andrew Napolitano for a television appearance in which Napolitano explains the legal process crime of obstruction of justice.  He then accuses Trump of multiple counts of obstruction based on incidents described in the redacted Mueller report which has been released.

Here’s the article explaining Trump’s fury:

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/441009-trump-foxs-napolitano-asked-me-to-pardon-his-friend-put-him-on

And here’s the four minute television spot by Napolitano explaining the crime of obstruction of justice and averring multiple counts of this crime by Trump:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/04/25/napolitano_why_was_president_trump_not_charged_with_obstruction_of_justice_is_the_president_above_the_law.html

Two former federal prosecutors, writing in The Daily Beast, agree with Napolitano and assert that if Trump were not president, he would already be indicted for obstruction of justice:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/if-trump-werent-president-he-would-already-be-charged?ref=scroll