Emissions Tied to the International
Trade of Agricultural Goods Are Rising
Scientists
have conducted a thorough examination of international trade in agricultural
goods, finding that consumers in wealthy countries enjoy the produce while
people in less-developed nations endure heightened greenhouse gas emissions and
environmental degradation.
From: University of California, Irvine
May 6, 2022 -- Earth
system scientists at the University of California, Irvine and other
institutions have drawn the clearest line yet connecting consumers of
agricultural produce in wealthier countries in Asia, Europe and North America
with a growth in greenhouse gas emissions in less-developed nations, mostly in
the Southern Hemisphere.
In a paper published
today in Science, the researchers report that trade in land-use
emissions -- which come from a combination of agriculture and land-use change
-- increased from 5.1 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent (when factoring in
other greenhouse gas emissions such as nitrous oxide and methane) per year in
2004 to 5.8 gigatons in 2017.
In the paper, the
scientists found that land-use change -- including clearing of carbon-absorbing
forests to create space for farms and pastures -- contributed roughly
three-quarters of the amount of greenhouse gases driven by the global trade of
agricultural goods between 2004 and 2017.
"Roughly a quarter
of all human greenhouse gas emissions are from land use," said co-author
Steven Davis, UCI professor of Earth system science. "Our work shows that
large shares of these emissions in lower-income countries are related to
consumption in more developed countries."
The top sources of
land-use-change emissions during the period studied were Brazil, where the
practice of removing natural vegetation such as forests to make room for
livestock pastures and farms has caused large transformation of land use in the
country, and Indonesia, where ancient, carbon-storing peats have been burned or
otherwise eliminated to enable the cultivation of plants to produce palm oil
for export to wealthy countries.
About 22 percent of the
world's crop and pastureland -- 1 billion hectares -- is used to cultivate
products destined for overseas consumers, according to the researchers.
Commodities such as rice, wheat, corn, soybeans, palm oil and other oil seeds
occupy nearly one third of the land used for traded goods and contribute
roughly half of traded greenhouse emissions.
The study showed shifts
that took place in certain regions between 2004 and 2017: In the early phase,
China was a net exporter of agricultural goods, but by 2017, it had become an
importer of both goods and land-use emissions, in part from Brazil. At the same
time, Brazil's exports to Europe and the United States, which had been the
nation's largest trading partners in agricultural goods in 2004, declined.
In 2017, the last year
the researchers examined, the largest source of export-related emissions was
Brazil, followed by Argentina, Indonesia, Thailand, Russia and Australia. The
largest net importers of products tied to such emissions were China, the U.S.,
Japan and Germany, with the U.K., Italy, South Korea and Saudi Arabia
following.
In addition to adding
greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, human land use practices have caused
significant ecosystem disruption, degraded biodiversity, depleted water
resources and introduced other types of pollution to local environments.
From an economic
standpoint, the exporters producing the highest amounts of land use emissions
are also heavily dependent on export agriculture as a contributor to gross
domestic product.
Davis said, "We
hope this study will raise awareness of the role of international trade in
driving land-use emissions. In turn, importers can adopt 'buy clean' policies
to reduce the most emissions-intensive imports and discourage regions from
gaining an environmentally destructive trade advantage. We recognize that
several regions, including Europe, the U.S., and China, have seen an increase
in efforts taken to improve supply chain transparency in recent years -- a good
sign indeed."
The project -- funded by
the National Science Foundation and U.S. Department of Agriculture, the
ClimateWorks Foundation, and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation -- also
included researchers from the University of California, San Diego; the
University of California, Davis; Stanford University; China's Tsinghua
University, Beijing Normal University, Peking University, Chinese Academy of
Sciences; and Germany's Ludwig-Maximilian University.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/05/220506184058.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment