Neurologica Blog
Published by Steven Novella
Let’s consider the following scenario –
the Earth is at risk for a disruptive event. This event has, conservatively,
about a 0.2% chance of happening on any given year. But that is the most
conservative estimate, at the high end it could be more like 12% over the next
decade. Either way the chance of this type of event happening in the 21st
century is quite high, and no matter what it is inevitable.
The result will likely be taking out
power grids, possibly worldwide in a worst-case scenario. Reasonable recovery
will take about a year, with full recovery taking about a decade. Just imagine
what would happen if we lost our power grid for a year. No digital banking, no
internet, no household power. The most conservative estimate of how much such
an event would cost is $2 trillion dollars, but experts are increasingly
leaning toward $20 trillion as being a closer estimate (and this figure will
only go up in the future).
So here’s my question – what do you
think we should spend now to avoid a high probability of civilization collapse
over the next century costing tens of trillions of dollars and growing? I am
not talking about global warming, or environmental degradation, the death of
the bees, an asteroid strike, or massive crop failure. I am talking about a coronal
mass ejection (CME) – a solar storm.
A CME is actually the greatest threat to
civilization that we face, in terms of probability and effect. In fact I think
we are underestimating the chaos that a worst-case scenario would cause.
Imagine going without power for a year. I know, there are people around the
world who live without power, and the residents of Peurto Rico recently
experienced something similar. But if this happened on a global scale, there’s
no one coming with aid. Global infrastructures on which we all depend would
collapse. How many people would starve or freeze? How much wood would be burned
to keep warm or cook until the power comes back on? There are so many
downstream effects that we cannot anticipate.
A CME is essentially a solar storm which
burps out a stream of ionized particles. If a particularly big storm is aimed
at the Earth, the resulting magnetic field would induce an electrical current
in anything large enough. A powerful induced electric current can destroy
electronic equipment, including the transformers upon which our electrical
grids depend. The grid, with miles of conducting wire, is incredibly vulnerable
to such events. Our satellites are more vulnerable, however, because they are
less protected by the Earth’s magnetic field. Only the most powerful CME will
hit the ground, but even modest ones could threaten satellites. Your small
electronic devices are probably safe, unless they are plugged in.
The last really powerful CME to hit was
in 1859, known as the Carrington Event. This hit when we were right at the dawn
of the electrical age. The CME was strong enough to induce a current in
telegraph lines, taking them down and causing them to spark, even starting some
fires. This was just a taste, however, of what would happen today. But there
have been other large CME events – 1872, 1909, 1921, and 1989. The 1989 one was
strong enough to take down Quebec’s power grid for a week. Some of these storms
were as strong as the Carrington event, just not optimally aimed at the Earth.
So what are we doing about this
undeniably dire eventuality? Surprisingly little. What would you spend today to
save trillions of dollar sometime this century? I would think it would be worth
spending at least tens of billions of dollars, if not hundreds of billions.
What can we do?
The ESA is planning with NASA the
Lagrange Mission. They will be sending a satellite to Lagrange 5. The
Lagrangian points are locations in the sun-earth system (any two bodies in
orbit around each other) where the overlapping gravitational fields are at a
minimum. It’s like a gravity well, where every direction is essentially up
hill. So it takes minimal energy to keep a satellite in this position. L5 is at
a point behind the Earth in its orbit around the sun. In this position it would
have a preview of the surface of the sun that is about to rotate toward the
Earth. So this would be a great early-warning system for a large solar storm.
That’s a good start. This would give
astronauts time to get into cover, and to lock down some satellites that could
be saved if they are powered off. But that is not enough time to save the grid.
At best it’s enough time to unplug all your devices, turn off computers, and
perhaps make a run at the grocery store. But the grid is still going down.
We already know the solution and have a
good estimate of the cost. We can harden transformers against a CME, so they
won’t explode when one hits. This would cost about $350,000 per circuit, or
$10-30 billion for the US. So we are in the range of tens of billions for large
countries, and hundreds of billions for the world. Even if it costs the world a
trillion dollars, we would likely save 20 trillion or more (plus all the
nuisance of civilization collapsing).
We could also invest in spare
transformers so that the backbone of the grid could be repaired more quickly.
FEMA could also invest in mobile transformers that it could use as a stop-gap
while the grid is being repaired.
We need to upgrade our electrical grid
anyway, in order to prepare for the energy production of the future. While
we’re at it, let’s take the time to defend ourselves against an inevitable, and
actually quite likely on the short term, catastrophe. This one is a no-brainer.
It’s exactly the kind of thing governments are supposed to do. Right now they
are failing. Let’s hope they figure this out before the next Carrington-level
event.
About the author: Dr. Novella is an academic clinical neurologist at Yale University School of Medicine. He is the president and co-founder of the New England Skeptical Society. He is the host and producer of the popular weekly science podcast, The Sceptics’ Guide to the Universe. He is also a senior fellow and Director of Science-Based Medicine at the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF), a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) and a founding fellow of the Institute for Science in Medicine.
No comments:
Post a Comment