Paul v.
Virginia, 75 US 168 (1869), is a US corporate law case, of the United
States Supreme Court. It held that a corporation is not a citizen within the
meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause. Of greater consequence, the
Court further held that "issuing a policy of insurance is not a
transaction of commerce," effectively removing the business of insurance
beyond the United States Congress's legislative reach.
In the 19th century, the insurance business was exclusively regulated by the states, individually. As a result, a patchwork of separate regulations proliferated to the dismay of insurance companies which sought uniform regulation across states. In an effort to promote federal regulation of the insurance industry, a number ofNew York insurance
companies orchestrated a test case to try to invalidate state regulation. On
February 3, 1866, the legislature of Virginia had passed a statute provided
that an insurance company not incorporated under the laws of the state should
not carry on its business within the State without previously obtaining a
license for that purpose and that it should not receive such license until it
had deposited with the treasurer of the state bonds in an amount varying from
thirty to fifty thousand dollars.
In May 1866, Samuel Paul, a resident of theCommonwealth of Virginia , was appointed the agent of the New York insurance
companies, to carry on the general business of insurance against fire. He then
applied for a license to act as such agent within the state, offering at the
time to comply with all the requirements of the statute with the exception of
the provision requiring a deposit of bonds with the treasurer of the state.
Based on his failure to comply with the requirements of the statute, the
license was refused. Notwithstanding this refusal he undertook to act in the
State as agent for the New York
companies without any license.
Paul sold a fire insurance policy to a citizen ofVirginia .
He was then indicted and convicted in the Circuit Court of the city of Petersburg , and was
sentenced to pay a fine of $50. Paul claimed that the statute was invalid.
Facts
In the 19th century, the insurance business was exclusively regulated by the states, individually. As a result, a patchwork of separate regulations proliferated to the dismay of insurance companies which sought uniform regulation across states. In an effort to promote federal regulation of the insurance industry, a number of
In May 1866, Samuel Paul, a resident of the
Paul sold a fire insurance policy to a citizen of
Judgment
Supreme Court of Virginia
The Supreme Court
of Appeals of the State, the judgment was affirmed, and the case was then
appealed to the Supreme Court. Paul claimed that the writ of error on the
judgment in the lower court violated Privileges and Immunities Clause, which
provides that "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all
Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States" and the
Commerce Clause, which empowers Congress "to regulate commerce with
foreign nations, and among the several States."
Supreme Court of the United States
The US Supreme
Court held that a corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of the Privileges
and Immunities Clause. It also held that "issuing a policy of insurance is
not a transaction of commerce," effectively removing the business of
insurance beyond the United States Congress's legislative reach.
Significance
In 1944, the Supreme Court overturned
the holding of Paul v.
Virginia in United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association,
finding that insurance transactions were subject to federal regulation under
the Commerce Clause.
No comments:
Post a Comment